Add a checker for the documentation
This patchset add some unit tests on the documentation: Checking wrapping Checking trailing spaces Checking no_cr Change-Id: I3fa56d3e7dd3218dcd398e6750bdd2fb3a8e75b4
This commit is contained in:
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ Bug tracker
|
||||
|
||||
Mailing list (prefix subjects with ``[watcher]`` for faster responses)
|
||||
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Wiki
|
||||
http://wiki.openstack.org/Watcher
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -71,23 +71,27 @@ An :ref:`Action Plan <action_plan_definition>` is a flow of
|
||||
a given :ref:`Goal <goal_definition>`.
|
||||
|
||||
An :ref:`Action Plan <action_plan_definition>` is generated by Watcher when an
|
||||
:ref:`Audit <audit_definition>` is successful which implies that the :ref:`Strategy <strategy_definition>`
|
||||
:ref:`Audit <audit_definition>` is successful which implies that the
|
||||
:ref:`Strategy <strategy_definition>`
|
||||
which was used has found a :ref:`Solution <solution_definition>` to achieve the
|
||||
:ref:`Goal <goal_definition>` of this :ref:`Audit <audit_definition>`.
|
||||
|
||||
In the default implementation of Watcher, an :ref:`Action Plan <action_plan_definition>`
|
||||
In the default implementation of Watcher, an
|
||||
:ref:`Action Plan <action_plan_definition>`
|
||||
is only composed of successive :ref:`Actions <action_definition>`
|
||||
(i.e., a Workflow of :ref:`Actions <action_definition>` belonging to a unique
|
||||
branch).
|
||||
|
||||
However, Watcher provides abstract interfaces for many of its components,
|
||||
allowing other implementations to generate and handle more complex :ref:`Action Plan(s) <action_plan_definition>`
|
||||
allowing other implementations to generate and handle more complex
|
||||
:ref:`Action Plan(s) <action_plan_definition>`
|
||||
composed of two types of Action Item(s):
|
||||
|
||||
- simple :ref:`Actions <action_definition>`: atomic tasks, which means it
|
||||
can not be split into smaller tasks or commands from an OpenStack point of
|
||||
view.
|
||||
- composite Actions: which are composed of several simple :ref:`Actions <action_definition>`
|
||||
- composite Actions: which are composed of several simple
|
||||
:ref:`Actions <action_definition>`
|
||||
ordered in sequential and/or parallel flows.
|
||||
|
||||
An :ref:`Action Plan <action_plan_definition>` may be described using
|
||||
@@ -134,7 +138,8 @@ is a role for users which allows them to run any Watcher commands, such as:
|
||||
- Launch an :ref:`Audit <audit_definition>`
|
||||
- Get the :ref:`Action Plan <action_plan_definition>`
|
||||
- Launch a recommended :ref:`Action Plan <action_plan_definition>` manually
|
||||
- Archive previous :ref:`Audits <audit_definition>` and :ref:`Action Plans <action_plan_definition>`
|
||||
- Archive previous :ref:`Audits <audit_definition>` and
|
||||
:ref:`Action Plans <action_plan_definition>`
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
The :ref:`Administrator <administrator_definition>` is also allowed to modify
|
||||
@@ -163,7 +168,8 @@ be one of the following:
|
||||
event handling mechanism) and is in the queue for being processed by the
|
||||
:ref:`Watcher Decision Engine <watcher_decision_engine_definition>`
|
||||
- **ONGOING** : the :ref:`Audit <audit_definition>` is currently being
|
||||
processed by the :ref:`Watcher Decision Engine <watcher_decision_engine_definition>`
|
||||
processed by the
|
||||
:ref:`Watcher Decision Engine <watcher_decision_engine_definition>`
|
||||
- **SUCCEEDED** : the :ref:`Audit <audit_definition>` has been executed
|
||||
successfully (note that it may not necessarily produce a
|
||||
:ref:`Solution <solution_definition>`).
|
||||
@@ -191,7 +197,8 @@ An :ref:`Audit Template <audit_template_definition>` contains at least the
|
||||
|
||||
It may also contain some error handling settings indicating whether:
|
||||
|
||||
- :ref:`Watcher Applier <watcher_applier_definition>` stops the entire operation
|
||||
- :ref:`Watcher Applier <watcher_applier_definition>` stops the
|
||||
entire operation
|
||||
- :ref:`Watcher Applier <watcher_applier_definition>` performs a rollback
|
||||
|
||||
and how many retries should be attempted before failure occurs (also the latter
|
||||
@@ -241,10 +248,12 @@ Cluster Data Model
|
||||
==================
|
||||
|
||||
A :ref:`Cluster Data Model <cluster_data_model_definition>` is a logical
|
||||
representation of the current state and topology of the :ref:`Cluster <cluster_definition>`
|
||||
representation of the current state and topology of the
|
||||
:ref:`Cluster <cluster_definition>`
|
||||
:ref:`Managed resources <managed_resource_definition>`.
|
||||
|
||||
It is represented as a set of :ref:`Managed resources <managed_resource_definition>`
|
||||
It is represented as a set of
|
||||
:ref:`Managed resources <managed_resource_definition>`
|
||||
(which may be a simple tree or a flat list of key-value pairs)
|
||||
which enables Watcher :ref:`Strategies <strategy_definition>` to know the
|
||||
current relationships between the different
|
||||
@@ -253,7 +262,8 @@ current relationships between the different
|
||||
and enables the :ref:`Strategy <strategy_definition>` to request information
|
||||
such as:
|
||||
|
||||
- What compute nodes are in a given :ref:`Availability Zone <availability_zone_definition>`
|
||||
- What compute nodes are in a given
|
||||
:ref:`Availability Zone <availability_zone_definition>`
|
||||
or a given :ref:`Host Aggregate <host_aggregates_definition>` ?
|
||||
- What :ref:`Instances <instance_definition>` are hosted on a given compute
|
||||
node ?
|
||||
@@ -263,16 +273,19 @@ such as:
|
||||
- What is the available bandwidth on a given network link ?
|
||||
- What is the current space available on a given virtual disk of a given
|
||||
:ref:`Instance <instance_definition>` ?
|
||||
- What is the current state of a given :ref:`Instance <instance_definition>` ?
|
||||
- What is the current state of a given :ref:`Instance <instance_definition>`?
|
||||
- ...
|
||||
|
||||
In a word, this data model enables the :ref:`Strategy <strategy_definition>`
|
||||
to know:
|
||||
|
||||
- the current topology of the :ref:`Cluster <cluster_definition>`
|
||||
- the current capacity for each :ref:`Managed resource <managed_resource_definition>`
|
||||
- the current amount of used/free space for each :ref:`Managed resource <managed_resource_definition>`
|
||||
- the current state of each :ref:`Managed resources <managed_resource_definition>`
|
||||
- the current capacity for each
|
||||
:ref:`Managed resource <managed_resource_definition>`
|
||||
- the current amount of used/free space for each
|
||||
:ref:`Managed resource <managed_resource_definition>`
|
||||
- the current state of each
|
||||
:ref:`Managed resources <managed_resource_definition>`
|
||||
|
||||
In the Watcher project, we aim at providing a generic and very basic
|
||||
:ref:`Cluster Data Model <cluster_data_model_definition>` for each
|
||||
@@ -295,7 +308,8 @@ to:
|
||||
:ref:`Cluster Data Model <cluster_data_model_definition>`
|
||||
(the proposed data model acts as a pivot data model)
|
||||
|
||||
There may be various :ref:`generic and basic Cluster Data Models <cluster_data_model_definition>`
|
||||
There may be various
|
||||
:ref:`generic and basic Cluster Data Models <cluster_data_model_definition>`
|
||||
proposed in Watcher helpers, each of them being adapted to achieving a given
|
||||
:ref:`Goal <goal_definition>`:
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -311,8 +325,10 @@ proposed in Watcher helpers, each of them being adapted to achieving a given
|
||||
|
||||
Note however that a developer can use his/her own
|
||||
:ref:`Cluster Data Model <cluster_data_model_definition>` if the proposed data
|
||||
model does not fit his/her needs as long as the :ref:`Strategy <strategy_definition>`
|
||||
is able to produce a :ref:`Solution <solution_definition>` for the requested :ref:`Goal <goal_definition>`.
|
||||
model does not fit his/her needs as long as the
|
||||
:ref:`Strategy <strategy_definition>` is able to produce a
|
||||
:ref:`Solution <solution_definition>` for the requested
|
||||
:ref:`Goal <goal_definition>`.
|
||||
For example, a developer could rely on the Nova Data Model to optimize some
|
||||
compute resources.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -335,16 +351,21 @@ history may be used by any :ref:`Strategy <strategy_definition>` in order to
|
||||
find the most optimal :ref:`Solution <solution_definition>` during an
|
||||
:ref:`Audit <audit_definition>`.
|
||||
|
||||
In the Watcher project, a generic :ref:`Cluster History <cluster_history_definition>`
|
||||
In the Watcher project, a generic
|
||||
:ref:`Cluster History <cluster_history_definition>`
|
||||
API is proposed with some helper classes in order to :
|
||||
|
||||
- share a common measurement (events or metrics) naming based on what is
|
||||
defined in Ceilometer. See `the full list of available measurements <http://docs.openstack.org/admin-guide-cloud/telemetry-measurements.html>`_
|
||||
defined in Ceilometer.
|
||||
See `the full list of available measurements <http://docs.openstack.org/admin-guide-cloud/telemetry-measurements.html>`_
|
||||
- share common meter types (Cumulative, Delta, Gauge) based on what is
|
||||
defined in Ceilometer. See `the full list of meter types <http://docs.openstack.org/admin-guide-cloud/telemetry-measurements.html>`_
|
||||
defined in Ceilometer.
|
||||
See `the full list of meter types <http://docs.openstack.org/admin-guide-cloud/telemetry-measurements.html>`_
|
||||
- simplify the development of a new :ref:`Strategy <strategy_definition>`
|
||||
- avoid duplicating the same code in several :ref:`Strategies <strategy_definition>`
|
||||
- have a better consistency between the different :ref:`Strategies <strategy_definition>`
|
||||
- avoid duplicating the same code in several
|
||||
:ref:`Strategies <strategy_definition>`
|
||||
- have a better consistency between the different
|
||||
:ref:`Strategies <strategy_definition>`
|
||||
- avoid any strong coupling with any external metrics/events storage system
|
||||
(the proposed API and measurement naming system acts as a pivot format)
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -369,8 +390,8 @@ services:
|
||||
- Cinder scheduler: for volumes management
|
||||
- Glance controller: for image management
|
||||
- Neutron controller: for network management
|
||||
- Nova controller: for global compute resources management with services such as
|
||||
nova-scheduler, nova-conductor and nova-network
|
||||
- Nova controller: for global compute resources management with services
|
||||
such as nova-scheduler, nova-conductor and nova-network.
|
||||
|
||||
In many configurations, Watcher will reside on a controller node even if it
|
||||
can potentially be hosted on a dedicated machine.
|
||||
@@ -388,7 +409,8 @@ Customer
|
||||
========
|
||||
|
||||
A :ref:`Customer <customer_definition>` is the person or company which
|
||||
subscribes to the cloud provider offering. A customer may have several :ref:`Project(s) <project_definition>`
|
||||
subscribes to the cloud provider offering. A customer may have several
|
||||
:ref:`Project(s) <project_definition>`
|
||||
hosted on the same :ref:`Cluster <cluster_definition>` or dispatched on
|
||||
different clusters.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -484,11 +506,12 @@ measure of how much of the :ref:`Goal <goal_definition>` has been achieved in
|
||||
respect with constraints and :ref:`SLAs <sla_definition>` defined by the
|
||||
:ref:`Customer <customer_definition>`.
|
||||
|
||||
The way efficiency is evaluated will depend on the :ref:`Goal <goal_definition>`
|
||||
to achieve.
|
||||
The way efficiency is evaluated will depend on the
|
||||
:ref:`Goal <goal_definition>` to achieve.
|
||||
|
||||
Of course, the efficiency will be relevant only as long as the :ref:`Action Plan <action_plan_definition>`
|
||||
is relevant (i.e., the current state of the :ref:`Cluster <cluster_definition>`
|
||||
Of course, the efficiency will be relevant only as long as the
|
||||
:ref:`Action Plan <action_plan_definition>` is relevant
|
||||
(i.e., the current state of the :ref:`Cluster <cluster_definition>`
|
||||
has not changed in a way that a new :ref:`Audit <audit_definition>` would need
|
||||
to be launched).
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -551,21 +574,21 @@ which provides a good definition.
|
||||
SLA violation
|
||||
=============
|
||||
|
||||
A :ref:`SLA violation <sla_violation_definition>` happens when a :ref:`SLA <sla_definition>`
|
||||
defined with a given :ref:`Customer <customer_definition>` could not be
|
||||
respected by the cloud provider within the timeframe defined by the official
|
||||
contract document.
|
||||
A :ref:`SLA violation <sla_violation_definition>` happens when a
|
||||
:ref:`SLA <sla_definition>` defined with a given
|
||||
:ref:`Customer <customer_definition>` could not be respected by the
|
||||
cloud provider within the timeframe defined by the official contract document.
|
||||
|
||||
.. _slo_definition:
|
||||
|
||||
SLO
|
||||
===
|
||||
|
||||
A Service Level Objective (SLO) is a key element of a :ref:`SLA <sla_definition>`
|
||||
between a service provider and a :ref:`Customer <customer_definition>`. SLOs
|
||||
are agreed as a means of measuring the performance of the Service Provider and
|
||||
are outlined as a way of avoiding disputes between the two parties based on
|
||||
misunderstanding.
|
||||
A Service Level Objective (SLO) is a key element of a
|
||||
:ref:`SLA <sla_definition>` between a service provider and a
|
||||
:ref:`Customer <customer_definition>`. SLOs are agreed as a means of measuring
|
||||
the performance of the Service Provider and are outlined as a way of avoiding
|
||||
disputes between the two parties based on misunderstanding.
|
||||
|
||||
You can also read `the Wikipedia page for SLO <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Service_level_objective>`_
|
||||
which provides a good definition.
|
||||
@@ -575,9 +598,10 @@ which provides a good definition.
|
||||
Solution
|
||||
========
|
||||
|
||||
A :ref:`Solution <solution_definition>` is a set of :ref:`Actions <action_definition>`
|
||||
generated by a :ref:`Strategy <strategy_definition>` (i.e., an algorithm) in
|
||||
order to achieve the :ref:`Goal <goal_definition>` of an :ref:`Audit <audit_definition>`.
|
||||
A :ref:`Solution <solution_definition>` is a set of
|
||||
:ref:`Actions <action_definition>` generated by a
|
||||
:ref:`Strategy <strategy_definition>` (i.e., an algorithm) in order to achieve
|
||||
the :ref:`Goal <goal_definition>` of an :ref:`Audit <audit_definition>`.
|
||||
|
||||
A :ref:`Solution <solution_definition>` is different from an
|
||||
:ref:`Action Plan <action_plan_definition>` because it contains the
|
||||
@@ -593,8 +617,8 @@ applied.
|
||||
|
||||
Two approaches to dealing with this can be envisaged:
|
||||
|
||||
- **fully automated mode**: only the :ref:`Solution <solution_definition>` with
|
||||
the highest ranking (i.e., the highest
|
||||
- **fully automated mode**: only the :ref:`Solution <solution_definition>`
|
||||
with the highest ranking (i.e., the highest
|
||||
:ref:`Optimization Efficiency <efficiency_definition>`)
|
||||
will be sent to the :ref:`Watcher Planner <watcher_planner_definition>` and
|
||||
translated into concrete :ref:`Actions <action_definition>`.
|
||||
@@ -610,11 +634,13 @@ Strategy
|
||||
========
|
||||
|
||||
A :ref:`Strategy <strategy_definition>` is an algorithm implementation which is
|
||||
able to find a :ref:`Solution <solution_definition>` for a given :ref:`Goal <goal_definition>`.
|
||||
able to find a :ref:`Solution <solution_definition>` for a given
|
||||
:ref:`Goal <goal_definition>`.
|
||||
|
||||
There may be several potential strategies which are able to achieve the same
|
||||
:ref:`Goal <goal_definition>`. This is why it is possible to configure which
|
||||
specific :ref:`Strategy <strategy_definition>` should be used for each :ref:`Goal <goal_definition>`.
|
||||
specific :ref:`Strategy <strategy_definition>` should be used for each
|
||||
:ref:`Goal <goal_definition>`.
|
||||
|
||||
Some strategies may provide better optimization results but may take more time
|
||||
to find an optimal :ref:`Solution <solution_definition>`.
|
||||
@@ -628,8 +654,9 @@ provided as well.
|
||||
Watcher Applier
|
||||
===============
|
||||
|
||||
This component is in charge of executing the :ref:`Action Plan <action_plan_definition>`
|
||||
built by the :ref:`Watcher Decision Engine <watcher_decision_engine_definition>`.
|
||||
This component is in charge of executing the
|
||||
:ref:`Action Plan <action_plan_definition>` built by the
|
||||
:ref:`Watcher Decision Engine <watcher_decision_engine_definition>`.
|
||||
|
||||
See :doc:`architecture` for more details on this component.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -658,8 +685,8 @@ Watcher Decision Engine
|
||||
=======================
|
||||
|
||||
This component is responsible for computing a set of potential optimization
|
||||
:ref:`Actions <action_definition>` in order to fulfill the :ref:`Goal <goal_definition>`
|
||||
of an :ref:`Audit <audit_definition>`.
|
||||
:ref:`Actions <action_definition>` in order to fulfill the
|
||||
:ref:`Goal <goal_definition>` of an :ref:`Audit <audit_definition>`.
|
||||
|
||||
It first reads the parameters of the :ref:`Audit <audit_definition>` from the
|
||||
associated :ref:`Audit Template <audit_template_definition>` and knows the
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user