From 5b2cdb53a8e27f8119c46d158166313f395366ae Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: zhuzeyu <zhu.zeyu@zte.com.cn>
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2017 17:01:36 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] Using items() instead of six.iteritems()

We'd better not use six.iteritems(), read follow doc
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-June/066391.html

Change-Id: I32aff3ad0cc936c6b623db313b6f6a0790cbc7fb
---
 watcher/hacking/checks.py | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/watcher/hacking/checks.py b/watcher/hacking/checks.py
index 8f9494163..a9e3371a1 100644
--- a/watcher/hacking/checks.py
+++ b/watcher/hacking/checks.py
@@ -16,7 +16,6 @@ import os
 import re
 
 import pep8
-import six
 
 
 def flake8ext(f):
@@ -61,7 +60,7 @@ def _regex_for_level(level, hint):
 
 log_translation_hint = re.compile(
     '|'.join('(?:%s)' % _regex_for_level(level, hint)
-             for level, hint in six.iteritems(_all_log_levels)))
+             for level, hint in _all_log_levels.items()))
 
 log_warn = re.compile(
     r"(.)*LOG\.(warn)\(\s*('|\"|_)")